<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>museum of folly &#187; art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.follymuseum.com/tag/art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.follymuseum.com</link>
	<description>stuff and nonsense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:53:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reproduction of Les Demoiselles d&#8217;Avignon, 1990s</title>
		<link>http://www.follymuseum.com/demoiselles-avignon-galenson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.follymuseum.com/demoiselles-avignon-galenson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>xensen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.follymuseum.com/?p=151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York City (publisher), Hong Kong (printer) Fragment of a page from a book; ink and colors on paper Via the New York Times The Museum of Folly was, regrettably, unable to purchase the original painting by Pablo Picasso of Les Demoiselles d&#8217;Avignon (1907). This reproduction was torn out of an art history textbook. David [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.follymuseum.com">the Museum of Folly</a> (MoFo), internationally acclaimed museum of foolishness.
Follow our director, Dr. Thom, on <a href="http://twitter.com/xensen" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/twitter.com/xensen?referer=');">twitter</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.follymuseum.com/demoiselles-avignon-galenson/">Reproduction of <em>Les Demoiselles d&#8217;Avignon,</em> 1990s</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" title="picasso, les demoiselles davignon" src="http://www.follymuseum.com/images-08/demoiselles-davignon.jpg" alt="picasso, les demoiselles d'avignon" width="525" height="549" /></p>
<p>New York City (publisher), Hong Kong (printer)<br />
Fragment of a page from a book; ink and colors on paper<br />
<em>Via the <a title="economist on art works (ny times)" href="picasso, les demoiselles d'avignon" target="_blank">New York Times</a></em></p>
<p>The Museum of Folly was, regrettably, unable to purchase the original painting by Pablo Picasso of <em>Les Demoiselles d&#8217;Avignon</em> (1907). This reproduction was torn out of an art history textbook.</p>
<p>David Galenson, an economist at the University of Chicago, has proposed an exquisitely stupid method of determining the greatest artworks of the twentieth century. He simply counts how often a work is reproduced in textbooks. &#8220;Quantification,&#8221; Galenson complains, &#8220;has been almost totally absent from art history.&#8221; Using this method, Galenson has definitively determined that the top five most important artworks of the twentieth century, in order, are:<span id="more-151"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>Pablo Picasso, <em>Les Demoiselles d&#8217;Avignon, </em>1907</li>
<li>Vladimir Tatlin, <em>The Monument to the Third International, </em>1919-1920</li>
<li>Robert Smithson, <em>Spiral Jetty, </em>1970</li>
<li>Richard Hamilton, <em>Just What Is It That Makes Today&#8217;s Homes So Different, So Appealing?,</em> 1956</li>
<li>Pablo Picasso, Guernica,  <em>1937</em></li>
</ol>
<p>MoFo applauds this marvelously simpleminded approach. By applying the quantification approach to literature, for example, we can also determine the most important works of U.S. literature, simply by <a title="best sellers" href="http://www.caderbooks.com/bestintro.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.caderbooks.com/bestintro.html?referer=');">referring to best-seller lists</a>. <!--more-->Such a list of great literature would include the following works, all number one best-sellers (one best-seller has been chosen from each decade of the twentieth century):</p>
<ul>
<li>1900s: Frances Little, <em>The Lady of the Decoration</em></li>
<li>1910s: Zane Grey, <em>The U. P. Trail</em></li>
<li>1920s: Zane Grey, <em>The Man of the Forest</em></li>
<li>1930s: Grand Duchess Marie, <em>Education of a Princess</em></li>
<li>1940s: Bob Hope, <em>I Never Left Home</em></li>
<li>1950s: William Brinkley, <em>Don&#8217;t Go Near the Water</em></li>
<li>1950s<em>: </em>Pat Boone, <em>&#8216;Twixt Twelve and Twenty</em></li>
<li>1960s: Jacqueline Susann, <em>Valley of the Dolls </em></li>
<li>1970s: Erich Segal, <em>Love Story</em></li>
<li>1980s: Joan D. Vinge, adapt., <em>Return of the Jedi Storybook</em></li>
<li>1990s: Alexandra Ripley, <em>Scarlett: The Sequel to Margaret Mitchell&#8217;s &#8220;Gone with the Wind&#8221;</em></li>
</ul>
<p>Museum visitors wishing to explore the twentieth century&#8217;s greatest works of literature are advised to begin with this remarkable list.</p>
<p>.</p>
<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.follymuseum.com">the Museum of Folly</a> (MoFo), internationally acclaimed museum of foolishness.
Follow our director, Dr. Thom, on <a href="http://twitter.com/xensen" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/twitter.com/xensen?referer=');">twitter</a>.<br/><br/><a href="http://www.follymuseum.com/demoiselles-avignon-galenson/">Reproduction of <em>Les Demoiselles d&#8217;Avignon,</em> 1990s</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.follymuseum.com/demoiselles-avignon-galenson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
